Configuration¶
ASQI uses YAML configuration files to define systems, test suites, and score cards. All configurations use Pydantic schemas for type safety and include JSON Schema files for IDE integration.
IDE Integration¶
For the best development experience, add schema references to your YAML files:
# For systems configuration files
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/asqi-engineer/asqi-engineer/refs/heads/main/src/asqi/schemas/asqi_systems_config.schema.json
# For test suite files
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/asqi-engineer/asqi-engineer/refs/heads/main/src/asqi/schemas/asqi_suite_config.schema.json
# For score card files
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/asqi-engineer/asqi-engineer/refs/heads/main/src/asqi/schemas/asqi_score_card.schema.json
# For test container manifest files
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/asqi-engineer/asqi-engineer/refs/heads/main/src/asqi/schemas/asqi_manifest.schema.json
This enables real-time validation, autocompletion, and documentation in VS Code, PyCharm, and other editors using the published schemas from GitHub.
Systems Configuration¶
Systems represent the AI services, models, and APIs that participate in testing.
LLM API Systems¶
The primary system type for language models using OpenAI-compatible APIs:
systems:
# Direct provider configuration
openai_gpt4o_mini:
type: "llm_api"
description: "Fast and General Purpose Model from OpenAI"
provider: "openai"
params:
base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
api_key: "sk-your-openai-key"
# LiteLLM proxy configuration
proxy_llm:
type: "llm_api"
description: "Fast and General Purpose Model from OpenAI"
provider: "openai"
params:
base_url: "http://localhost:4000/v1"
model: "gpt-4o-mini"
api_key: "sk-1234"
# Using environment variable fallbacks
fallback_llm:
type: "llm_api"
description: "Custom Model"
provider: "custom"
params:
model: "my-model"
# base_url and api_key will use fallbacks from .env
Environment Variable Handling¶
ASQI supports a three-level configuration hierarchy:
Explicit Parameters (highest priority): Directly specified in system configuration
Environment File Fallbacks: Values from
.envfile or customenv_fileConfigure your environment file with the following variables
Required
API Configuration
# Environment variables to pass into test containers that specifies an env_file BASE_URL=http://localhost:4000 API_KEY=sk-1234
Database
# Database connection string DBOS_DATABASE_URL=postgres://postgres:asqi@db:5432/asqi_starter
Observability
# Otel OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://jaeger:4318/v1/traces
LiteLLM Configuration
# Master key for LiteLLM LITELLM_MASTER_KEY="sk-1234"
Optional
HuggingFace Token
# HuggingFace Token - Required for some gated datasets HF_TOKEN=hf_api_V9oSu3L1onGE0Yz2s2swlT8ZtJ
Container logs
# Path for the container logs (default: logs) LOGS_FOLDER=asqi/logs
API Keys
# OpenAI OPENAI_API_KEY=api-key-openai # Anthropic ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=api-key-anthropic # Amazon Bedrock AWS_BEARER_TOKEN_BEDROCK=api-key-bedrock
Validation Error: If required fields are missing
Environment File Reference¶
Systems can specify a custom environment file:
systems:
production_system:
type: "llm_api"
description: "High Performance Model from OpenAI with Reasoning Capabilities"
provider: "openai"
params:
base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
model: "gpt-4o"
env_file: "production.env" # Custom environment file
String Interpolation¶
ASQI supports environment variable interpolation directly in YAML configuration files using shell-style syntax:
# Direct substitution - uses environment variable or empty string if not set
image: ${REGISTRY}/my-app:latest
# Default value - uses environment variable or default if not set/unset
image: ${REGISTRY:-docker.io}/my-app:latest
# Default if unset - uses environment variable (including empty) or default if unset
image: ${REGISTRY-docker.io}/my-app:latest
Examples¶
suite_name: "Dynamic Testing Suite"
description: "Runs Security Tests"
test_suite:
- name: "registry_test"
description: "Test for Security Vulnerabilities using Garak"
image: ${REGISTRY:-my-registry}/garak:latest
systems_under_test: ["${TARGET_SYSTEM:-openai_gpt4o}"]
params:
api_key: "${API_KEY}"
model: "${MODEL:-gpt-4o-mini}"
Test Suite Configuration¶
Test suites define collections of tests to execute against your systems.
Basic Test Suite¶
suite_name: "Basic Mock Testing"
description: "Simple Compatibility Checks"
test_suite:
- name: "compatibility_check"
description: "Verifies Basic Compatibility"
image: "my-registry/mock_tester:latest"
systems_under_test: ["my_llm_service"]
params:
delay_seconds: 1
Multi-System Tests¶
Tests can coordinate multiple AI systems for complex scenarios:
suite_name: "Advanced Chatbot Testing"
description: "Evaluates Chatbot Performance, Safety..."
test_suite:
- name: "chatbot_simulation"
description: "Simulates Realistic Conversations with the Chatbot"
image: "my-registry/chatbot_simulator:latest"
systems_under_test: ["my_chatbot"]
systems:
simulator_system: "gpt4o_simulator"
evaluator_system: "claude_evaluator"
params:
chatbot_purpose: "customer service"
num_scenarios: 5
sycophancy_level: "medium"
Multiple Tests in One Suite¶
suite_name: "Comprehensive Security Testing"
description: "Spot Vulnerabilities in the Target Model"
test_suite:
- name: "prompt_injection_test"
description: "Checks if the Model Can be Tricked by Malicious Prompts"
image: "my-registry/garak:latest"
systems_under_test: ["target_model"]
params:
probes: ["promptinject"]
generations: 10
- name: "encoding_attack_test"
description: "Tests the Model Against Attacks Using Encoded Inputs"
image: "my-registry/garak:latest"
systems_under_test: ["target_model"]
params:
probes: ["encoding.InjectHex"]
generations: 5
- name: "red_team_assessment"
description: "Simulates Attacks to Find Jailbreaks or Injections"
image: "my-registry/deepteam:latest"
systems_under_test: ["target_model"]
params:
attack_types: ["jailbreak", "prompt_injection"]
max_iterations: 20
Score Card Configuration¶
Score cards define automated assessment criteria for test results. They evaluate individual test executions (not aggregated results).
Basic Score Card Structure¶
score_card_name: "Production Readiness Assessment"
indicators:
- name: "Test Success Requirement"
apply_to:
test_name: "security_scan"
metric: "success"
assessment:
- { outcome: "PASS", condition: "equal_to", threshold: true }
- { outcome: "FAIL", condition: "equal_to", threshold: false }
Assessment Conditions¶
Score cards support various comparison operators:
indicators:
- name: "Performance Score Assessment"
apply_to:
test_name: "benchmark_test"
metric: "score"
assessment:
- { outcome: "EXCELLENT", condition: "greater_equal", threshold: 0.9 }
- { outcome: "GOOD", condition: "greater_equal", threshold: 0.8 }
- { outcome: "ACCEPTABLE", condition: "greater_equal", threshold: 0.7 }
- { outcome: "NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT", condition: "less_than", threshold: 0.7 }
- name: "Security Threshold"
apply_to:
test_name: "vulnerability_scan"
metric: "vulnerabilities_found"
assessment:
- { outcome: "SECURE", condition: "equal_to", threshold: 0 }
- { outcome: "LOW_RISK", condition: "less_equal", threshold: 2 }
- { outcome: "HIGH_RISK", condition: "greater_than", threshold: 2 }
Available Conditions¶
equal_to: Exact value matching (supports boolean and numeric)greater_than/less_than: Strict numeric comparisonsgreater_equal/less_equal: Inclusive numeric comparisons
Targeting Specific Tests¶
Use the apply_to field to target specific tests:
indicators:
- name: "Garak Security Check"
apply_to:
test_name: "garak_prompt_injection" # Only applies to this test
metric: "attack_success_rate"
assessment:
- { outcome: "SECURE", condition: "equal_to", threshold: 0.0 }
- { outcome: "VULNERABLE", condition: "greater_than", threshold: 0.0 }
Container Interface Specification¶
Standardized Entry Point¶
All test containers must implement a standardized interface:
# entrypoint.py
import argparse
import json
import sys
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--systems-params", required=True, help="JSON string with system configurations")
parser.add_argument("--test-params", required=True, help="JSON string with test parameters")
args = parser.parse_args()
systems_params = json.loads(args.systems_params)
test_params = json.loads(args.test_params)
# Extract systems
sut_params = systems_params.get("system_under_test", {})
simulator_system = systems_params.get("simulator_system", sut_params)
evaluator_system = systems_params.get("evaluator_system", sut_params)
# Run your test logic here
results = run_test(sut_params, test_params, simulator_system, evaluator_system)
# Output JSON results to stdout
print(json.dumps(results))
Manifest Declaration¶
Each container includes a manifest.yaml describing its capabilities:
name: "advanced_security_tester"
version: "2.0.0"
description: "Comprehensive security testing framework"
input_systems:
- name: "system_under_test"
type: "llm_api"
required: true
description: "The primary system being tested"
- name: "evaluator_system"
type: "llm_api"
required: false
description: "Optional system for result evaluation"
input_schema:
- name: "attack_types"
type: "array"
required: true
description: "List of attack vectors to test"
- name: "max_iterations"
type: "integer"
required: false
description: "Maximum number of test iterations"
output_metrics:
- name: "success"
type: "boolean"
description: "Whether the test completed successfully"
- name: "vulnerabilities_found"
type: "integer"
description: "Number of vulnerabilities discovered"
- name: "attack_success_rate"
type: "float"
description: "Percentage of successful attacks (0.0 to 1.0)"
Validation and Error Handling¶
Fail-Fast Validation¶
Input validation occurs before expensive operations
Clear error messages with context and suggestions
Centralized validation functions in
validation.py
Cross-Validation¶
ASQI performs comprehensive compatibility checking:
System-Test Compatibility: Ensures systems match test container requirements
Parameter Validation: Validates test parameters against container schemas
Resource Availability: Checks Docker image availability and manifest validity
Environment Requirements: Validates API keys and environment configuration
Error Recovery¶
DBOS Durability: Workflows can resume from checkpoints after failures
Container Isolation: Failed containers don’t affect other tests
Graceful Degradation: Partial results are preserved even if some tests fail
Detailed Logging: Comprehensive logs for debugging and troubleshooting